Tired of your website not being at all festive? Rails applications lacking that Christmas zing? You need my new Rails plugin, acts_as_father_christmas, to bring that holiday spirit to your application.
Here's your dull, dry, non-festive site:

Now with acts_as_father_christmas installed:

Finally, with all the trimmings:

It's a standard Rails plugin, so from inside your app., do:
$ ruby script\plugin source http://svn.receptacular.org/plugins $ ruby script\plugin install acts_as_father_christmas
To turn any controller into a Santa's grotto of delights, add this line inside a controller class definition:
class TestController < ApplicationController acts_as_father_christmas ... end
To turn on red capital letters, pass the optional :merry => true:
class TestController < ApplicationController acts_as_father_christmas(:merry => true) ... end
Finally, to sprinkle some magic over your site, pass in a block and call the magic method inside it:
class TestController < ApplicationController
acts_as_father_christmas(:merry => true) do
magic
end
...
end
This is a fully-working Rails plugin, but if you're daft enough to use it and it breaks stuff, don't blame me. MIT Licence, in case you were wondering.
I have quite a few ogg files, as well as a few mp3s. Occasionally I like to change formats around so I can play oggs on my mp3 player, or give them to friends and family. I have a few batch scripts lying around which do this using ogg2mp3, toolame etc., but they lose the ogg tags and I usually end up with mp3s without tags.
I thought things could be better, so I went in search of a tool to help. I found a Ruby script called The Sneetchalizer, which is great. To get it working I had to install ruby-mp3info (using gem) and download ruby-ogginfo. The latter isn't a gem, so you have to make sure you include it in Ruby's load path (see the example below). Also, rather than install it, I just pulled the sneetchalizer file out of the tarball, added a .rb to the end of it, and ran it directly using Ruby.
Sneetchalizer uses a whole bunch of Linux command line tools and Ruby libraries to do its work, but providing you've got them installed (probably you just need oggenc, oggdec and lame or toolame), it works a charm. It supports a whole load of audio formats and options, so had no problem with my ogg to mp3 challenge.
Here's an example of the command line I used to translate some ogg files in one directory into mp3s in another one:
ruby -I ~/Desktop ~/Desktop/sneetchalizer.rb --out=mp3 --in=ogg -r --sanitize \ -D /home/ell/no_backup/music/for_chloe_mp3s /home/ell/no_backup/music/for_chloe
Notice the -I option passed to Ruby, which makes any Ruby files in the stated path (~/Desktop in my case) available on the load path. I also like the fact that you can tell it to sanitize tags (--sanitize); and work recursively (-r).
I've been fiddling with Merb lately (more another time), and found that on Linux the DataObjects drivers don't install very easily. To get them to work under the old version of AxleGrease (my pioneering :) Ruby on Rails on XAMPP distribution for Linux) was proving particularly traumatic. Plus I wanted to play with Rails 2, now it's out.
As a consequence, I decided to dust off and update AxleGrease for myself, and thought in the process I might as well put the new version up on RubyForge. Which I have. So you can get hold of it if you like. It has Merb but only supports DataObjects with SQLite3, not MySQL. I tried for about 2 hours to get MySQL support working, but couldn't. I did manage to compile the C code, but couldn't build a gem, as I think XAMPP is missing one of the MySQL libraries that DataObjects expects. I gave up (I use SQLite 3 for development anyway).
By the way, why Merb? Well, because I want to write a Ruby application which can easily connect to multiple database backends, and has decent support for a plugin-style architecture. Merb has both of those. Also, Merb is very slim and seems more suitable for writing frameworks; I've been trying to do this with Rails, but writing a framework inside a framework for writing apps. (if you follow me) is a bit of a headache at times. The only thing I can't do with Merb (yet) is run it under JRuby. But I don't think that will be far away.
Also, I am loving some of the new features in Rails: in particular, isolation of initializer code into its own directory (so environment.rb doesn't turn into a quagmire); resource routing and the whole ActiveResource thing; and the support for easy switching of output formats (respond_to). Unfortunately, I am using Rails Engines for the project I'm working on, and they don't work with Rails 2 yet. Although I imagine it can't be long.
Seems like Packt have decided to give away a fairly substantial chapter of my Rails book. You can get chapter 4 for free (PDF). This one is about Rails' architecture, MVC, database configuration and troubleshooting, migrations, validation and unit testing. Get it while it's free!
I could do with some feedback on it. I'm not sure if anyone's read it or likes it. I never considered this aspect of being a writer before: you have no idea of how well your book is selling, other than the vague indications given by Amazon. It's a bit odd really.
I recently got a Dell Latitude D820 at work, and spent about 10 days pulling my hair out using Windows XP on it. Once I'd run out of hair, and after clearing it with the technical support people and my bosses, I persuaded them to let me install Linux (though they insisted on me keeping a small Windows boot partition).
Anyway, I've been using it successfully for the last 6 weeks or so, and it's been working great. Today, I worked from home for the first time, and wanted to get a few other things working:
In summary, I managed to get this lot working fine, and would say this machine is a nice one for running Linux. I don't like it quite as much as my old Thinkpad Z61t (keyboard isn't quite so nice), though I've never managed to get the wireless working on that.
The wireless worked fine, but for some reason the network applet just refused to allow me to connect. Eventually, I managed to get it working by hard-coding the IP address into the network config., and setting up the router to assign a static IP to the wireless card. But there was no need to install any drivers or anything: all of that was just working out of the box.
The touchpad was another matter, and took me about half an hour to figure out. In the end, after having read about 6 different articles on installing various shades of Linux on this model of laptop, I came across this extremely useful article, which enabled me to fix it definitively.
Eventually, I had to make two edits to /etc/X11/xorg.conf (as root). First, I added a line to the ServerLayout configuration element:
Section "ServerLayout"
Identifier "Default Layout"
Screen "Default Screen"
Inputdevice "Generic Keyboard"
Inputdevice "Configured Mouse"
# HERE'S MY EDIT
Inputdevice "Touchpad" "AlwaysCore"
Inputdevice "stylus" "SendCoreEvents"
Inputdevice "cursor" "SendCoreEvents"
Inputdevice "eraser" "SendCoreEvents"
EndSection
Then I added a new section for the touchpad itself:
Section "InputDevice"
Driver "synaptics"
Identifier "Touchpad"
Option "Device" "/dev/input/event3"
Option "Protocol" "event"
Option "LeftEdge" "130"
Option "RightEdge" "840"
Option "TopEdge" "130"
Option "BottomEdge" "640"
Option "FingerLow" "7"
Option "FingerHigh" "8"
Option "MaxTapTime" "0"
Option "MaxTapMove" "0"
Option "EmulateMidButtonTime" "75"
Option "VertScrollDelta" "20"
Option "HorizScrollDelta" "0"
Option "UpDownScrolling" "1"
Option "MinSpeed" "0.70"
Option "MaxSpeed" "1.20"
Option "AccelFactor" "0.080"
Option "EdgeMotionMinSpeed" "200"
Option "EdgeMotionMaxSpeed" "200"
Option "SHMConfig" "on"
Option "Emulate3Buttons" "on"
EndSection
The important bit is where I specify the Device as /dev/input/event3. Also note I set MaxTapTime to 0 to turn off taps acting as mouse clicks. You may have to muck around with the *Speed and AccelFactor settings to suit you: there is a GUI client called gsynaptics which can configure scroll speed and taps; and there is a more comprehensive command line application synclient which helps if you want to fiddle around with the settings in real time.
I found this article which provided the necessary settings. After I'd made the changes suggested, everything worked brilliantly: even the wireless came back from suspend. (Note that I use the proprietary NVidia drivers, so the instructions are specific to that.)
First off, I edited /etc/X11/xorg.conf, adding a couple of settings to the NVidia driver setup:
Section "Device"
Identifier "nVidia Corporation G72M [GeForce Go 7400]"
Driver "nvidia"
Busid "PCI:1:0:0"
Option "UseEDIDDpi" "False"
Option "AddARGBVisuals" "True"
Option "AddARGBGLXVisuals" "True"
Option "NoLogo" "True"
Option "NvAGP" "1"
EndSection
Then I edited /etc/defaults/acpi-support (in all cases, the default setting was true):
SAVE_VBE_STATE=false POST_VIDEO=false USE_DPMS=false LOCK_SCREEN=false
As part of my work at Talis, I'm currently working on a RESTful application (for library data). I've read the RESTful Web Services book, I know about RESTful Rails, I'm aware of the Atom Publishing Protocol, and I've done some work with the Amazon S3 interface. But so far I can't find a complete agreement on the exact semantics of POST vs. PUT. Which one maps onto resource creation, and which one onto update? The frameworks I mentioned above aren't in complete agreement:
I think it boils down to:
I went back to RFC 2616 for the formal distinction between POST and PUT, which is defined as follows:
"The POST method is used to request that the origin server accept the entity enclosed in the request as a new subordinate of the resource identified by the Request-URI in the Request-Line." (trans.: if you create a new resource "inside" an existing URI, use POST: this applies if you are doing something like creating a new resource and you don't know what its URI will be).
"The PUT method requests that the enclosed entity be stored under the supplied Request-URI." (trans.: use PUT if you know the URI of the resource you are creating or modifying).
This ties with the definition given in one of the comments by Sergio (thanks). What's interesting about this is that creating a resource where you know the resulting URI should use PUT; a modification will generally use PUT; and creating a resource where you don't know the resulting URI for it should use POST. The RESTful Web Services book follows this line.
Any other thoughts?
I find the command completion tools in a shell indispensable (i.e. when you press Tab to complete a path or show you the options for a command - this works for svn, for example). Plus I get quite annoyed when they don't work for a command I'm using. I found out today it is pretty easy to add your own completions using the complete command (at least, when using Bash under Linux).
So here, for example, is how to get Rake to auto-complete with the names of the tasks in your Rake file:
complete -W "$(rake -T | awk 'NR != 1 {print $2}')" rake
It's not flawless, but it's a damn sight better than having to do rake -T and scrolling through a wordy list. NB this only works if you run the complete command in a directory where you have a Rake file to start with. There's probably some switch to complete which dynamically generates the completions when you try to use them: I need to investigate.
You could also try something like this to put up a list of names of hosts in your /etc/hosts file when you're using SSH:
complete -W "$(cat /etc/hosts | awk '$1 != "#" {print $2}')" ssh
You can just add these to your Bash profile to get them activated when starting a new shell, I imagine.
My (co-authored) Rails book, Ruby on Rails Enterprise Application Development: Plan, Program, Extend, is out. Finally. Feels like quite a relief for it to be out there, after about a year's work.
I was fiddling around with some designs for Spring REST applications this weekend, writing in a notebook. While I was writing, my daughter, Madeleine, came over to see what I was doing. She returned to the table, wrote on a piece of paper, then brought it back, proudly emblazoned with the word "PUT". Then she went backwards and forwards to the table, copying bits of what I was writing. This was the end result:

In case you can't read it, it says:
REST VERBS PUT POST DELETE GET
If I ever do a presentation on REST, I will definitely include this picture. Cute.
I spent a couple of hours last night and this installing Koha, an open source library management system. Unlike systems such as VuFind and Scriblio which are just OPACs (i.e. a web-based front-end for bibliographic catalogue data), Koha is a full-fledged LMS (or ILS, as they are called in the US). It's written in Perl, and runs as two sets of Perl CGI scripts under a web server like Apache, with MySQL as the back-end.
Installation was, how shall I say it diplomatically, not straightforward. The points that tripped me up were:
Listen directives to make Apache listen on the ports I had configured Koha to run on.The end result: a running LMS, with separate OPAC and admin. front ends. Rather confusingly, the admin. front end asks you for a card number to login, when what you need is the MySQL username to access the database.
I have to say that I thought the installation process was over-complicated. Ironically, by creating an installer which generates the database and copies the files for you, they make it harder to fix errors when one step in the process fails. For example, I had to try to do the whole installation about 8 times, rolling back all the changes to directories and the MySQL database each time it failed (near the end). I'd much rather the steps an installation process are discrete: create directories, copy the files, create the database and user, pipe in the SQL commands to setup the database, generate the httpd config., etc.. That way, if step 6 out of 6 steps goes wrong, I don't need to roll back the previous 5 steps.
I haven't got time to play with it now, but will post my thoughts when I do. So far, I'd say the admin. area is pretty slick:

And the OPAC simple but functional:

I need to do some config. to make it do interesting things, but at least I finally got it running.